User talk:Les Meloures

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Weiler Monument 110 Regiment.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Ham-sur-Meuse Barrage.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:07, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


File:Orzy Barrage.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Blasius w.jpg[edit]

Hi. Perhaps you could check the info and confirm on the file page (permission field ?) that you gave permission for Cornischong to upload your photo? --MGA73 (talk) 16:59, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same with File:Bobby Julich w.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One more: File:CFL-Dosto-Steierwon-w.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 17:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Found File:Cote de Solières .jpg also. --MGA73 (talk) 19:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot to log in when editing ^ :-D
I also found File:F 45 w.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 17:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you also fix File:Flandria vun 1975.jpg? --MGA73 (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great! What about File:Fouga-Magister--ww.jpg? --MGA73 (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:FN-Browning--w.jpg could also use an edit :-) --MGA73 (talk) 20:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And File:Herstal Musée communal w .jpg would also be nice if you could fix. --MGA73 (talk) 07:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Someone forgot to log in :-D
Now also File:Pläitreng.jpg and File:Ferme de Pleitrange.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
+ File:Schleis 2 Vue an d-Schleis.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 21:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And File:Reckschlagklapp--w.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You have taken a lot of photos :-) File:Schlass-Neufchâteau--w.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 16:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
+File:Schleis 1 A.jpg, File:Schleis 1 B.jpg and File:Schleis 15 zu Poulseur.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 16:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
+ File:Soiron Giewel 2 w.jpg and File:Soiron Wäschbur w.jpg and File:Soiron-Duerf-w.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 20:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now a flower: File:Pissblumm-w.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the last one: File:ZARAGOZA PUEBLOS 2001.jpg? --MGA73 (talk) 14:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rue de prague under Luxembourg Viaduct Feb02 2013.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

DR notice[edit]

Hi. I noticed this so perhaps you could comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canal Albert tête de garde amont entrée vers le canal au fond à droite le barrage Monsin.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 08:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:N69 op kp 49,7.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:N69 op kp 49,7.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Aqueduc de la Vanne Pont à Pont-sur-Yonne.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aqueduc de la Vanne Pont à Pont-sur-Yonne.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kausch--w.jpg[edit]

Hi. Could you perhaps make a small edit and confirm in the edit-summary that this is your work? --MGA73 (talk) 12:27, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And also File:Seelklemm--1---w.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 12:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
English: Building by Henri Bouchard, who died in 1960. There is no FOP in France
Français : Bâtiment de Henri Bouchard (sculpteur), décédé en 1960. Or en France, il est interdit de diffuser l'oeuvre d'un artiste sans son accord durant sa vie, ou sans l'accord de ses ayant droits jusque 70 ans après sa mort. Cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons le 1er janvier 2030.

Marianne Casamance (talk) 09:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour je propose de bien vouloir vérifier toute la catégorie et de na pas faire seulement dans le détail. --Les Meloures (talk) 15:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C'est prévu et en cours. Votre photo n'est effectivement pas la seule concernée. D’autres demandes sont actuellement en cours. Marianne Casamance (talk) 05:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frimholz / Fremholz / Friemholz[edit]

Salut, Ech hat mech gëiert - d'Fotoe sinn net am Iechternacher Deel vun dem Bësch gemaacht ginn, mä zu Bäerdref.

Op "mengem" Geoportail gëtt den Iechternacher Deel awer Frimholz genannt, d'Feld dernieft Beim Frimholz a Fremholz zu Bäerdref - hoss Du en anere Geoportail?

Dëst ass vläit och interessant: Lieux-dits officiels.

Schéinen Dag nach

--Jwh (talk) 13:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blason de Halanzy[edit]

Salut, Tu as bien raison pour la source, elle n'est pas correcte. J'avais repris la base d'un autre fichier et juste transposé en oubliant de supprimer cette source. La vraie source est l'ancien site web du village. Je changerai la source dès que possible.

Schéinen Owend nach! --HolonZeias (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Ce qui n'evite pas pas que Halanzy n'avait jamais de blason, ce qui est d'ailleurs bien précisé sur la page 128 du Tome 1 des Armoiries Communales en Belgique. Il ne pourra donc pas être utilisé dans les infoboxes comme blason de Halanzy. Och nach e gudden Owend --Les Meloures (talk) 21:21, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koart XXXXX.jpg[edit]

Hi, please do not make repeated rename requests on files against the explicit wishes of the original uploader. Please also, review Commons:File renaming and COM:FRNOT before making any further rename requests simply to change language of a file name. TommyG (talk) 07:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Les Meloures and TommyG: Is "koart" an actual word? --MGA73 (talk) 10:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MGA73 and TommyG: Koart is issued from a dialect, the correct luxemburgish word is Kaart. There was also a discussion about this case with Estopedist1. The target of this renamings is that all files of maps issued from lb:Wiki shall have the same correct prefix not only because of the language but also in case of searching. People generally don't search in dialect-form. --Les Meloures (talk) 10:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, whatever may be the correct spelling, if the original uploader disagrees with your rename, please discuss this with them first. The correct procedure is not to add a new rename request without discussion after the original uploader removed your first request as you did with File:Koart Rëmeleng Hëseng.png, File:Koart Rëmeleng Gebrannte Bësch.png, File:Koart Rëmeleng Gebrannte Bësch.png, File:Koart Minettsbaseng.jpg, File:Koart Käler Waasserbuerg.jpg. As far as I can tell, there's nothing discussed on User:Otets talk page nor on any of the files in question, relevant to the rename request. TommyG (talk) 11:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored the rename requests and moved the files uploaded by @MGA73: 's bot as these were obviously declined due to incorrect assumptions on my part. TommyG (talk) 12:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@TommyG: I think you didn't read the User talk:Estopedist1 otherwise you had realised that Otets agrees to my proposals of renaming. --Les Meloures (talk) 12:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to have been some sort of invisible unicode character in the internal link to Estopedist1's user talk page, so it didn't bring me to the relevant discussion. Either way, a reference to this discussion would probably have been useful to include in the rename requests as it's a fairly non-obvious place to look. TommyG (talk) 12:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bazoches - 2.png[edit]

File:Bazoches - 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Borvan53 (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ech mengen dat ka geläscht ginn, et ass effektiv en Doublon. D'Saach schéngt mer déi heiten ze sinn, de Fotograf KaTeznik huet déi Foo gemat an op Commons gesat, due hues d'Foarwe verännert an domat besser gemat, an dat d'lb-wiki gesat. Ech hunn deng Versioun als neie Fichier op Commons gesat, herno huet en aneren deng Versioun iwwer dem KaTeznik säi Fichier driwwergelueden, a sou hu mer lo effektiv en Doublon. --Otets (talk) 12:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Les_Meloures&oldid=812525082"